(and to hell with you that tell me so!)
By Stu Cvrk | Jan 28, 2021 for RedState
Since Election Day, the Democrats and their operatives who infest the legacy media have maintained the fiction that the November elections were “the most secure in American history.” Their echo chamber (examples here, here, here, and here) fixed on the thoroughly debunked announcement by a Clinton operative in the Dept of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) that was made on 12 November just as evidence of massive election fraud was beginning to be compiled and reported by the Trump campaign and independent analysts across the country. The endless repetition of that early false report set the narrative that the Democrats, their operatives in the media, and even some weak-willed elected Republicans have repeated to this very day. They are attempting to firmly plant in the consciousness of the American electorate that that is the correct narrative despite many reports of election fraud that thoroughly destroy their claim.
While it is true none of the claims of election fraud have been proven in court, that is a factor of them not having been heard on the merits and not because there is no evidence.
One of the most recent examples of that was long-time Democrat operative George Stephanopoulos’s interchange with Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) on ABC”s Sunday morning news program “This Week.” Here is the correct headline describing the interchange in The Washington Times: “Rand Paul smackdown of George Stephanopoulos is what media deserve.” The key excerpt:
“George, where you make a mistake is people coming from the liberal side like you — you immediately say everything’s a lie instead of saying there’s two sides to everything. Historically, what would happen is I said I thought there was fraud, you would interview someone who said there wasn’t. Now you insert yourself in the middle and say the absolute fact is that everything I’m saying is a lie,” the Kentucky Republican said.
That’s exactly how the left-leaning members of the media have been acting: like paid defenders of the party, rather than paid watchdogs for the people.
Here is one example among many of how the Democrat operatives in the rest of the media spun that interchange, in this case in an ABC News article propagated by Big Tech’s “Microsoft News (MSN).” [Yes, the Democrats in Big Tech are key partners in spreading that false narrative, too.] Note how the ABC News headline proves the point of that Times article above: “Sen. Rand Paul continues making false claims of 2020 election fraud.”
The reality is that that ABC headline is the false claim, and that fact needs to be repeated endlessly along with the overwhelming proof that there is documented evidence of massive election fraud in the 2020 election. The evidence that has come about election fraud since Election Day is astounding: sworn depositions from many witnesses in state hearings, independent technical data analyses performed by statistical experts, many written depositions in several lawsuit affidavits sworn under threat of perjury, and many videos that captured election fraud criminality in real time.
I myself was privileged to report on independent analyses of election fraud on behalf of a team led by physicist and Mensa John Droz, Jr., whose purpose was to conduct a statistical analysis of certain voter data in key states in order to determine whether there were any significant anomalies evident. Here is the link to their analysis of massive anomalies in several Pennsylvania counties, with an excerpt from the article:
Biden’s vote totals in the four counties were 1.24 to 1.43 times greater than the totals for Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama (both elections). This is an absurd result, especially in the three Republican-leaning counties, given that Republican support for President Trump has hovered at 95% over the past year-plus. What is the probability that more Pennsylvanians in these counties voted for a thoroughly compromised candidate who did not even campaign down the stretch than voted for either Barack Hussein Obama or Hillary Clinton?
And here is a link to an article that summarizes the team’s discoveries in Michigan, along with a concluding excerpt from their report:
This is very strong evidence that the absentee voting counts in some counties in Michigan have likely been manipulated by a computer algorithm. The comparison of the 2020 results to the normal 2016 election data is dramatic. If no other plausible explanation can be made for these unexpected findings, it appears that this computer software was installed sometime after the 2016 Presidential election. On the surface, it would seem that the tabulating equipment in infected precincts has been programmed to shift a percentage of absentee votes from Trump to Biden.
The above articles (among many others written and posted in independent and conservative media) are written off by the Democrats and legacy media as “anecdotes” that don’t prove evidence of “sufficient fraud to have swung the election.” That is a variation on their theme of “most secure election in history.” But we are just getting started. One of the first comprehensive compilations of election fraud evidence was published on the FrontPage Mag blogsite on 23 December. That article contained convincing summary arguments that the election was in fact stolen that were supported by 93 linked sources provided as footnotes.
In parallel, Dr. Peter Navarro, Assistant to President Trump and Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, produced three separate report volumes that detailed election fraud:
- Volume I: The Immaculate Deception
- Volume II: The Art of the Steal
- Volume III: Yes, President Trump Won: The Case, Evidence & Statistical Receipts
Volume III summarized the evidence supporting “vote irregularities and illegalities” in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin in this graphic:
From the conclusion in Volume III (emphasis mine):
In light of this evidence, it is also irresponsible – in the extreme – for the Democrat Party and its leadership, or journalists in the mainstream media, or RINO Republicans to claim there is no evidence of election irregularities. That’s absurd on its face. As this report shows, there is an abundance of evidence – a virtual cornucopia of potentially poisonous election irregularities.
And of course, the Democrats and their media operatives have ignored and buried these reports as well, writing off Dr. Navarro as a hyper-partisan Trump supporter (implying he has no credibility at all by that simple pejorative). For example, here is the Forbes headline bashing one of the reports (emphasis mine): “White House Advisor Peter Navarro Releases Dubious Voter Fraud Report.” Just for context purposes, can you remember a single time over the past four years in which any of the dozens of fraudulent claims made against President Trump was ever reported as “dubious” by any legacy media outlet?
John Droz’s team remains outraged by Democrat-media complex’s continuing spread of the false narrative that “there was no election fraud in 2020.” They – like many frustrated Americans – are tired of the dishonest assertion that there was no vote fraud, malfeasance, or other irregularities/ illegalities, supposedly because “the courts dismissed those claims as unfounded, wildly exaggerated, etc.” That is simply not true. With an objective to counter that false narrative, the team compiled an extensive list of lawsuits involving the 2020 Presidential election, and identified the issues, the results, and what evidence was objectively analyzed. A screenshot of a portion of the document is provided here:
The information was gathered from seven sources, as cited in the online document. In compiling the document, the team walked the narrow line of being comprehensive while also making the product simple enough for the public to understand. The 61 court cases listed in the document involved these main topics: a) rules and regulation legalities or interpretation (e.g., about absentee ballots); b) process illegalities (e.g., officials correcting ballot errors); c) voter improprieties (e.g.; non-citizens voting, non-registered citizens voting, deceased parties voting, registered voters voting twice, etc.) and/or d) voting machine irregularities (e.g., an algorithm changing the actual results, etc.). Nine of the 15 cases that were decided on merit were in favor of President Trump (merit being defined as when the pleading included the ability to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given the opportunity to present evidence via discovery. The team further noted that, when the other cases were dismissed without ruling on the merits, there were three primary reasons given: a) standing, b) timing (Laches), and c) judicial authority (jurisdiction). Finally, the document lists 17 lawsuits that are still in process at this time.
That the Democrat-media complex continues to sidestep the critical national security issue of election integrity in the face of the extensive evidence of election fraud cited above is a travesty. That there remain 17 election fraud lawsuits that are still in process is a major story itself that they ignore and downplay. The narrative that “there was no widespread election fraud in 2020” is false, and those like Sen. Paul who confront the Democrats and their media operatives on that topic are on the side of the angels.